Kits: Wave Tomahawk preview
Posted on : 18-02-2010 | By : Cacophanus | In : Toys/Kits
Hardware: PlayStation 3, Xbox 360
3
The somewhat under-appreciated Wave have finally previewed their upcoming 1/72 scale MBR-04-MkVI Tomahawk destroid kit from the original Macross. Despite Yamato already releasing a toy of this design, kit connoisseurs rightfully revere the workmanship of Wave. After all, they’ve been making Five Star Stories kits for years and those mecha designs are some of the most intricate and complex ever conceived.
However, the Tomahawk’s past is a chequered one in the annals of mecha gaming. Specifically, it was re-purposed in BattleTech to form the obviously derivative Warhammer (even the official BattleTech artwork inadvertently retained the UN Spacy logo). It wasn’t long until FASA were sued, as the Tomahawk was but one of a plethora of designs lifted from various notable anime series of the time. That said, the recent MechWarrior reboot also fell foul of this plagiarism as it re-used the Warhammer in its teaser trailer, kicking off a whole new legal mess in the proceedings.
The sad aspect about all this is that the legal steps being taken aren’t meant to recompense the original Japanese team who penned the designs, but instead the Western company that distributed them. In any case, this kit is released in June for 6,800 yen and you can pre-order it here.
Maybe the UN Spacy logo was there because a mercenary team in the Battletech universe were just big Macross fans, kind of like how there used to be a Fighting Urukhai mercenary unit (until the Lord of the Rings movies came out and lawyers might start to smell the blood in the water, anyway).
The true legal situation was a lot more complicated than what you mention here. FASA had purchased the rights to use the imagery, but Harmony Gold also purchased the rights to the Macross series itself. The lawsuit that caused FASA to stop using the designs was brought on by Harmony Gold, NOT the actual creators of any of the disputed designs.
That’s the point that was made though; that these lawsuits benefit the US license holders and not the original Japanese designers. The links in the article also clarify that further.